Meeting Virtually Across the State

Regional Health Security Act Strategy Meetings

As COVID-19 cases continue to rise in our state, the need for Health Security has never been clearer. New Mexicans deserve health care that is affordable, and coverage that stays with them when they need it most.

While it may seem like a long time until the legislature reconvenes in January, now is the time to prepare for getting the Health Security Act passed in 2021.

We’ve scheduled four regional strategy meetings this summer, and Health Security supporters in the southern part of the state gathered last Saturday to get the ball rolling.

Our southern New Mexico meeting gets started.

Our southern New Mexico meeting gets started.

The meeting was a big success—the screenshot about shows just a few of those who attended. We spent much of our time in small breakout groups, and participants came up with great ideas to gain more support for the Health Security Act in their communities and among their legislators. Everyone left with action items, and with plans to regroup in the next few weeks. 

To find out more about meetings like these, sign up to receive our emails.

Retake Our Democracy Hosts Two Health Security Events

Update: To access recordings of these events, visit our In the Media page.

Radio Show on July 4; Panel Discussion on July 7

Campaign member organization Retake Our Democracy is planning two Health Security events.

  • Saturday, July 4, 8:30 AM

Paul Gibson of Retake Our Democracy will be interviewing our executive director, Mary Feldblum. You can tune in at KSFR 101.1 FM (Santa Fe Public Radio) or listen online.

  • Tuesday, July 7, 6:30-8:00 PM

Retake Our Democracy will be hosting a panel discussion with Mary Feldblum (Health Security Campaign executive director), Tyler Taylor, MD (Health Security Campaign board member), and Shelley Mann-Lev, MPH (NM Public Health Association board member). You must pre-register to join the Zoom session.

Retake Our Democracy works on a variety of important issues affecting the people of our state, and we appreciate their commitment to Health Security. Retake's Tuesday post — Why We Need the Health Security Act In NM: Yesterday! — is definitely worth a read!


Upcoming Events and an Expanding Coalition

Health Security Act Workshops & Meetings

Screen Shot 2020-06-27 at 9.27.44 AM.png

We've now held two successful bill workshops via Zoom (agenda on the right!), and we enjoyed putting faces to names and hearing participants' questions and ideas.

We plan to hold more bill workshops this summer and fall, with our next one tentatively scheduled for August 1.

A New Member for Our Coalition

A big welcome to Rio Grande Farmers' Coalition, our newest member organization!

If your organization would like to learn more about the Health Security Plan, please email us so we can set up a presentation to your group.

Major Flaws in KNG's Preliminary Fiscal Analysis

Our Take on the Preliminary Fiscal Analysis of the Health Security Plan

In late May, we noted that a preliminary report on the Health Security Plan fiscal analysis had been completed by KNG Health Consulting and that we were working hard on requested feedback.

Our comments have now been submitted to the NM Legislative Finance Committee, which is overseeing the fiscal analysis. A press release was also issued this morning.

What did we find?

Basically, KNG concludes that although the Health Security Plan would cost less than the current system—and would result in fewer than 1% of NM residents remaining uninsured—there would not be enough money to pay for it. In fact, they project a $7 billion “funding shortfall” under Health Security.

OK — Have a cup of coffee, and keep reading . . .

However, by KNG’s own projections, over the first 5 years, the Health Security Plan saves over $16 billion compared to the current system . 

As Campaign chair Max Bartlett puts it: “How is it possible that the Health Security Plan costs less but is not affordable? This calls into questions KNG’s assumptions, methodology, and conclusions.’’

First: To begin with, there is a $3 billion unexplained discrepancy in the report regarding health care spending under the Health Security Plan. One table shows the cost of the Health Security Plan in 2024 (the first year of implementation) at $9.259 billion , while the other puts it at $12.317 billion, a discrepancy that amounts to up to one third of the projected cost of the program. The underlying data behind these numbers is not clear, and there are all too many other inconsistencies in the figures KNG provides.

The conclusions presented in the report’s Executive Summary rely exclusively on the lower $9.259 billion number, which is quite a difference from the $12.113 billion that KNG projects we will spend in New Mexico on health care in 2024 if we do not implement the Health Security Plan .

Chart created by the Health Security for New Mexicans Campaign, based on KNG data.

Chart created by the Health Security for New Mexicans Campaign, based on KNG data.

Let's keep in mind that two previous studies, Lewin (1994) and Mathematica (2007), also found that Health Security would cost less than the current system. And not only did they determine that it would be less expensive, they found it would be affordable. 

Second: Determining affordability depends on more than just the cost of the Health Security Plan. Revenue is the other half of the equation. Here, we found revenue projections that lack data as well as explanations—along with an overall lack of transparency regarding how the projections were calculated.

Tyler Taylor, MD, who sits on our board, spent considerable time reviewing the federal funding that is available to help pay for the Health Security Plan. Based on public information, he identified federal revenues that total $6.8 billion more than what is reflected in KNG’s report.

We all want a final report that is accurate, unbiased, and high-quality. KNG has our feedback, and we hope that they will be able to make some major corrections, provide us with clear justifications for their assumptions, and produce substantiated conclusions.

Fiscal Analysis Preliminary Report Posted

The preliminary report from contractor KNG Health Consulting has been posted for feedback, and the Campaign is evaluating the report and preparing written comments to submit. Written comments are due June 8.

While the report does point out that the Health Security Plan will ensure that almost all New Mexicans have coverage and will reduce costs, we have some serious concerns about the report's technical integrity. 

Keep in mind that this is a preliminary report. The final one is due at the end of June.

For more on the preliminary report, including media coverage and our May 31 press release, check out our Studies & Articles page.

KNG preliminary report1.png

Learning Virtually

With in-person meetings out of the question for the time being, we've moved to virtual presentations and workshops.

Need a presenter for your next meeting?

Education & outreach coordinator Dana Millen presents to a community group via Zoom.

Education & outreach coordinator Dana Millen presents to a community group via Zoom.

Do you belong to a social, professional, or political group that might be interested in learning about the NM Health Security Act?

We'd love the opportunity to present to your group to discuss this important alternative.

Contact us for more information.

 

Virtual workshops

Executive director Mary Feldblum holds a bill workshop in Las Cruces in 2019.

Executive director Mary Feldblum holds a bill workshop in Las Cruces in 2019.

As much as we'd all like to meet together in a colorful space (see photo!), we'll have to make do with colorful backgrounds on Zoom for now.

But there's a silver lining. Have you wanted to participate in one of our workshops but haven't been in the right place at the right time?

Sign up for our email alerts to find out when we’re holding virtual workshops.

Health Security in the News

Some of the latest articles on Health Security . . .

For more media coverage of the Health Security Plan, check out our In the Media page.


It’s Time for Our Own Health Plan in New Mexico  

The COVID-19 outbreak has highlighted and accelerated the inequities of our nation, particularly in connection with health care delivery. Concerns about rising drug costs, increasing out-of-pocket costs  . . .

Read more


A Healthcare System in Crisis—and New Mexico’s Homegrown Solution

Every year, employers change plans and benefits because of rising healthcare costs. Private insurance companies routinely increase the premiums, deductibles, copays  . . .

Read more  [article begins on p. 12]

Health Insecurity

New Mexico instituted coronavirus-related restrictions in mid-March. We now have almost 100 deaths and more than 2,700 confirmed cases of COVID-19 in the state. While it seems as though we are successfully "flattening the curve," the process has been far from painless--and is likely far from over. Native Americans have been particularly hard hit, accounting for almost half of all cases in the state. 

Unsurprisingly, the pandemic is exposing major gaps in how we pay for and access health care.

Coverage Linked to Employment

According to today's Albuquerque Journal, more than 105,000 New Mexicans filed for unemployment benefits in the first 5 weeks since coronavirus-related closures began, and additional claims have yet to be processed.

What happens when people lose their jobs? All too often, they lose their health insurance as well.

This is a huge problem. People who suddenly no longer have a paycheck coming in and are worried about paying for food and housing also have to worry about how they might pay for an injury or illness.

With over one hundred thousand New Mexicans unemployed, there is a growing realization that those who have employer coverage simply cannot count on it. Under our current system, there is no health security.

Under Health Security, your health care coverage follows you wherever you go. One less thing to worry about!

The Costs of Our Fractured System

Rising drug costs, increasing out-of-pocket costs, and sky-high deductibles were already well-recognized problems. Now, with budgets tight for many New Mexicans, these issues are being brought into sharp relief. People are becoming aware that they may not be able to pay for needed health care--and that almost nothing has been done to address rising health care costs in this country.

Surprise billing

With more and more people on high-deductible insurance plans, often with a smaller pool of in-network medical providers, "surprise billing" is an area of increasing concern. Surprise bills happen when patients are treated at in-network facilities but are cared for by out-of-network providers. Insurance companies refuse to cover these bills, and patients who thought everything was covered find out--after the fact--that they owe substantial amounts.

While New Mexico has taken steps to ensure that patients are covered for coronavirus-related treatment, surprise billing remains an issue. The NM Superintendent of Insurance waived all cost sharing (deductibles, copays, and coinsurance) for insured patients for the diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19, flu, or pneumonia, but there are still serious gaps, such as emergency room visits that do not result in positive COVID-19 tests, ambulance costs, and surprise billing for services provided by out-of-network practitioners. (And, of course, this emergency rule applies only to those who are insured.)

(Wondering why no legislation on surprise billing has been passed by Congress? Read Kaiser Health News' explanation.)

Insurance Premiums

Insurance premiums are another major cost that has been a problem for years and that may be adversely affected by the COVID-19 crisis. While the future trajectory of this pandemic remains uncertain, premiums for private insurance next year could rise by up to 40%. Private insurers could also opt to increase out-of-pocket costs, shifting yet more of the burden onto consumers.

New Mexico has made some efforts to limit costs--like passing legislation in early 2020 that caps insulin copays at $25 per month--but these are systemic problems that call for a systemic solution.

Fragile Health Care Infrastructure

The COVID-19 outbreak is putting enormous financial pressure on already underfunded rural hospitals and clinics. (A February 2020 report found that 1 in 4 rural hospitals is vulnerable to closure.)

About a month ago, the New Mexico Department of Health prohibited health care providers and facilities from providing non-essential health services (defined as those that can be safely delayed for 3 months) until further notice. Hospitals have therefore postponed the procedures and "elective" surgeries that they perform every day, reducing critical revenue. At the same time, the number of New Mexicans hospitalized with COVID-19 remains relatively low--at 148 as of last count--so hospitals are not able to make up lost income by serving these patients. This situation is adversely affecting urban hospitals as well.

Setting up global budgets for hospitals across the state--as the Health Security Act does--would stabilize this vitally important part of our health infrastructure. Global budgeting is an approach that provides an annual, guaranteed budget for each hospital, based on the normal, anticipated services that are required of that hospital, with interim adjustments if needed. A global budget system is an alternative to the complicated charges that are creating enormous problems for so many patients and impacting health facility overhead costs. 

Under a system of global budgets, hospitals are guaranteed a stable revenue stream, which could be particularly advantageous for our struggling rural hospitals. An independent agency negotiates these budgets. 

(For more on global budgets, check out this article from Maryland, which has used them for several years.)

While the emergence of COVID-19 has focused attention on these underlying issues, they were here prior to the pandemic and will be here after we get the coronavirus under control. The best way to solve them is by enacting the Health Security Plan, a systemic solution that guarantees affordable coverage, decouples coverage from employment, addresses rising health care costs (including prescription drugs), sets up global budgets for hospitals, and enables savings to be invested in health infrastructure.

Checking in . . . from Home

The Health Security for New Mexicans Campaign’s Executive Committee and staff want to express our concern for the health and safety of all our state’s residents. We hope you are staying home, washing your hands(!), following the directives of our governor, and doing all that's necessary to help blunt the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Although we are at home, we are still working—and are busy figuring out what changes we need to make as we navigate this rapidly evolving situation. Virtual meeting platforms like Zoom will allow us to continue to present to local organizations and to hold trainings and information sessions for those interested in learning more about Health Security. 

And while the COVID-19 outbreak has prompted this shift toward online outreach, we can't help but notice that virtual options will make it possible for us to engage with people around the state in new ways. (Let us know if you're interested in a virtual workshop on Health Security or one that addresses what a fiscal analysis is all about.)

This crisis has only begun to expose the serious weaknesses in our health care system (and in our socioeconomic and political systems), and we expect that this situation will unfortunately get worse before it gets better. The number of COVID-19 cases in the state continues to rise, and last week alone close to 11,000 New Mexicans applied for unemployment benefits. The number of uninsured is likely rising in tandem. While we continue to work on long-term systemic health care reform, stopgap solutions on many fronts are needed right now.

The Superintendent of Insurance recently announced an emergency rule that waives all cost sharing (deductibles, copays, and coinsurance) for insured patients when services are needed to treat COVID-19, flu, or pneumonia. This is a positive step, but clearly much more is required—at both the federal and state levels—to ensure that all who need treatment will be able to receive it.  

To our health care providers, thank you. To everyone else, please stay home, and stay healthy!

For the latest updates on the situation in New Mexico, go to the NM Department of Health's COVID-19 website at https://cv.nmhealth.org/, or click on the image below. 

Drug Importation Bill Passes; Global Budgets Bill Doesn't 

We were interested in two bills during the 30-day legislative session that ended on February 20.

Drug Importation Program

Senate Bill 1, the Wholesale Prescription Drug Importation Act, sailed through the legislature, passing both houses unanimously. As one of the governor's priority bills, it will likely be quickly signed into law.

What will SB 1 do? SB 1 will set up a system for importing pharmaceutical drugs from Canada (and, if allowed by the federal government in the future, from other countries). New Mexicans now pay about twice as much as Canadians for brand-name drugs.

Specifically, SB 1 will create an Office of Wholesale Drug Importation at the NM Department of Health. This new office will negotiate with the federal government for approval of a Canadian wholesale drug importation plan to bring safe, lower-cost drugs into New Mexico, which lowers prices for consumers. (Not all drugs will be included in the plan.)

We supported this bill because implementing a drug importation program should significantly reduce drug costs for New Mexicans, while ensuring drug safety. Setting up such a process will also help to expedite bulk purchasing of pharmaceutical drugs (whether through importation or another mechanism) under the Health Security Act.

While questions have recently been raised about the feasibility of drug importation programs (Canada is not a fan!), seeing if it's possible to take advantage of this new federal opportunity makes sense.

Global Budgets for Hospitals

Senate Memorial 9, the All Payer Global Hospital Budget Task Force bill, did not fare as well as SB 1.

About global budgets and SM 9: This memorial would have set up a task force to explore how to implement global budgets for hospitals in New Mexico. Under a system of global budgets, hospitals are guaranteed a stable revenue stream, which could be particularly advantageous for our struggling rural hospitals. An independent agency negotiates these budgets.

A global budget system (which is included in the Health Security Act) is an alternative to the complicated charges that are creating enormous problems for so many patients and impacting health facility overhead costs. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) is currently providing substantial funds to states to implement global budget programs.

A task force tasked with investigating how to implement a global budget system could have offered a financially sustainable path forward for New Mexico health facilities, while providing relief to New Mexico patients facing inflated hospital prices and complex bills.  

What happened during the session: SM 9 was assigned to the Senate Rules Committee and was heard on February 3. It was the last bill on the agenda, and there were only six committee members (three Democrats and three Republicans) left in the room by the time it was heard. The result? A 3-3 tie on a no-recommendation motion, which, had it passed, would have moved the bill out of the committee. 
Although SM 9 appeared on the agenda multiple times in the final seven days of the session, it was not brought back up for reconsideration.

NM Hospital Association opposition: At the February 3 hearing, the NM Hospital Association was the only organization to testify in opposition to the memorial. (In contrast, the American Hospital Association--a national organization--is in favor of global budgets.) 

This took us by surprise, as we had heard that the NM Hospital Association was open to exploring this approach. And, of course, the memorial would only have set up a task force; it did not actually call for implementation of a global budget system.  

In fact, the NM Hospital Association went so far as to propose the complete removal of the words "global budgets" in the memorial and to change the purpose of the task force to explore "payment alternatives." 

What are "payment alternatives"? "Payment alternatives" (alternatives to the standard fee-for-service arrangement) is a broad term, as there are at least 37 models to date. For the most part, these alternatives require financial investments and the ability to take on risk--serious challenges for financially vulnerable hospitals. Because of this, both the US Government Accountability Office and the American Hospital Association have reported that most alternative payment models have not been appealing to rural hospitals. 

The global budget model, however, provides hospitals with a guaranteed stable revenue stream (which may include adjustments over the year) and does not require them to take on additional risk or find the money for investments in their operations. 

To address the needs of rural hospitals, the State of Pennsylvania has received CMS approval to develop a Rural Health Model. Thirteen rural hospitals have voluntarily signed up to participate. In its announcement, CMS notes the following: 

CMS believes this model will further CMS' goals of improving the health beneficiaries in rural areas, maintaining access to health care for rural populations, and determining the impact of an alternative payment model on rural providers, who have generally had lower rates of participation in alternative payment models[emphasis added] 

Working together: We were not the only ones in strong support of SM 9. We worked very closely with Health Action New Mexico and other allies on the bill, but ultimately the opposition of the NM Hospital Association--and the reality of a short 30-day legislative session--sank the memorial. 

We were able, however, to educate many legislators about the importance of global budgets as a critical tool to help financially vulnerable hospitals survive. Many were sincerely puzzled by the opposition of the NM Hospital Association, especially as the association expressed concern for rural hospitals. 

Moving forward: Now that the session is over, passage of the Health Security Act in 2021 is once again our major focus. And to be successful, we need your help. Please tell your friends about Health Security and continue to spread the word about this important health care solution! 

2020 Legislative Session Starts Tomorrow

2020 Legislative Session

The legislative session starts tomorrow, January 21, and runs through February 20. 

We're waiting for the fiscal analysis on the Health Security Plan to be completed (the final report is due June 30; see timeline below), so the Health Security Act will not be introduced this session. 

Bills to Watch This Session

The Health Security Act is about systemic change, which means it affects numerous aspects of our healthcare system as it addresses costs and universal coverage. 

Two of the Health Security provisions that will help control costs are global budgets for hospitals and clinics and bulk purchasing of drugs. These are integral parts of the Health Security Plan, so we'll be following two related legislative proposals this session:

hospital clip art

SM 9: All Payer Global Hospital Budget Task Force

Senate Memorial 9 (SM 9), sponsored by Sen. Jerry Ortiz y Pino, will create a task force to explore how to implement global budgets for hospitals in New Mexico.

Under a system of global budgets, hospitals are guaranteed a stable revenue stream. An independent agency negotiates these budgets. Global budgeting is an alternative to the complicated charges that are creating enormous problems for so many patients and impacting health facility overhead costs.

Perhaps you have heard about the Carlsbad hospital scandal. The hospital has been suing patients who have insurance but cannot pay the inflated hospital bills. Carlsbad's experience is not unique--even in New Mexico.(Watch the New Mexico in Focus program or read the original New York Times article for the full story.)  

And quite aside from exploitative pricing practices, many of our New Mexico hospitals, especially in rural areas, are facing financial difficulties.

Working on this issue now, prior to passage of the Health Security Act, will help to expedite setting up this aspect of the Health Security Plan. Moreover, investigating how to implement a global budget system can offer a financially sustainable path forward for New Mexico health facilities, while providing relief to New Mexico patients facing inflated hospital prices and complex bills.

SB 1: Wholesale Prescription Drug Importation Act

[Photo credit: Sharon McCutcheon on Unsplash]

Senate Bill 1, sponsored by Sen. Mary Kay Papen and Rep. Debbie Armstrong, will set up a system for importing pharmaceutical drugs from Canada. New Mexicans now pay about twice as much as Canadians for brand-name drugs.

SB 1 will create an Office of Wholesale Drug Importation at the NM Department of Health. This new office will negotiate with the federal government for approval of a Canadian wholesale drug importation plan to bring safe, lower-cost drugs into New Mexico.

This bill is on the governor's call, which means that its passage is a priority for Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham. SB 1 has an $350,000 appropriation, so it will definitely go to the Senate Finance Committee (among other committees).

Working on this issue now, prior to passage of the Health Security Act, will help to expedite bulk purchasing of pharmaceutical drugs under the Health Security Plan. In addition, implementing a drug importation system will significantly and immediately reduce drug costs for New Mexicans, while ensuring drug safety.

For Now and for Later

SM 9 and SB 1 offer important steps for providing relief to everyday New Mexicans and health facilities--while getting a head start on key provisions of the Health Security Plan. 

We'll be tracking these bills throughout the session, and we'll keep you posted.

The Latest on the Fiscal Analysis

Fiscal Analysis Update

healthcarecosts-500x300.jpg

As you know, in November the Legislative Finance Committee selected KNG Health Consulting, Dr. Lee Reynis (former executive director of UNM's Bureau of Business and Economic Research, or BBER), and IHS Markit to conduct the fiscal analysis of the Health Security Plan. (IHS Markit is a London-based global information provider, and BBER has used its services for many years to help with projected costs.)

On December 4, the Legislative Finance Committee staff held a public meeting in Albuquerque and introduced the lead consultant, KNG Health Consulting, to those in attendance. 

The president of KNG, Dr. Lane Koenig, explained how the group would approach the fiscal analysis. He noted that Dr. Lee Reynis would be very much involved in the study "every step of the way." (This is critical, since KNG is based in Maryland and has not had any experience in our state.) Dr. Koenig also made it very clear that KNG's role was to engage in a fiscal analysis of the Health Security Act and not come up with other models. KNG's slide presentation from the meeting is available here.

The meeting was well attended--by Health Security supporters, legislators, government agencies and other interested parties . . . and by insurance industry representatives. 

Senate Public Affairs Committee chair and Health Security Act sponsor Sen. Jerry Ortiz y Pino stated that he had great hopes that the results of this analysis would be acted on by the legislature (unlike the two other studies conducted in New Mexico). Rep. Bill Pratt, who was so instrumental in acquiring legislative funding to ensure that a fiscal analysis of the Health Security Plan would be conducted, pointed out how vital this analysis is for our state. 

The chair of our Campaign, Max Bartlett, provided KNG with important background information about the Campaign and the Health Security Act, which since 1993 has received input from diverse New Mexicans from all parts of the state. 

Our executive director, Mary Feldblum, then described her years of experience as an academic and her almost three decades of intensive review of numerous state and federal studies on universal health coverage plans.  To help guide KNG, she provided a list of the fixed assumptions of the Health Security Plan (such as who is included) that need to be costed out. 

She also gave examples of assumptions that are less clear, such as whether the federal government will allow our state to include Medicare recipients (who, of course, would not lose any of their rights). To account for situations like this, KNG will have to cost out one scenario that assumes Medicare recipients are in the Plan and another one that does not make that assumption. (The contract with KNG requires scenarios where the assumptions are not straightforward.) Mary subsequently submitted more detailed written comments to be passed along to KNG.

One question that was raised toward the end of the meeting was whether more public meetings were planned. Legislative Finance Committee staff member Ruby Ann Esquibel explained that the next public meeting is scheduled for April, when a preliminary report from KNG will be presented. The final report is due by the end of June. All materials available to legislators at these meetings will be provided to the public. In addition, the public will have an opportunity to make comments.

Key dates:

  • April 15, 2020: Preliminary report presented to the Legislative Finance Committee

  • May-June 2020: Presentations to Legislative Interim Committees (Legislative Finance Committee and Legislative Health and Human Services Committee)

  • June 15, 2020: Draft final report 

  • June 30, 2020: Final report 


Making National News

Our media coordinator, Donna Dowell, sent out a press release in early December that inspired an AP reporter to write about the fiscal analysis.  

The  article not only made it into the Albuquerque Journal, Santa Fe New Mexican, Los Alamos Monitor, and Taos News but was printed in many media sources around the country, including US News and World Report, Miami Herald, Chicago Tribune, and Houston Chronicle

Rep. Bill Pratt's Legacy

Rep. Bill Pratt, MD

Rep. Bill Pratt, MD

On Christmas day, our longtime supporter, former Executive Committee member, and dear friend, State Representative Bill Pratt, MD, passed away.

We will greatly miss Bill's thoughtful deliberation, his constant kindness, and his dedication to creating a better world in so many ways.

We first met Bill more than ten years ago, when he showed up at a statewide meeting we held in Socorro. A retired orthopedic surgeon, he had heard about us through another physician. 

He soon became an active and highly capable supporter, sharing information about the Health Security Act with the many people he came across. We kept hearing from other sources about the numerous meetings he went to, talking about Health Security. (He never stopped; he made a point of coming to speak at a presentation we made to the NM Public Health Association earlier this month.) 

Bill took over the leadership of the Physicians for the Health Security Act group, and he subsequently served on the Campaign's Executive Committee until his successful election as a state representative. 

What is so amazing about this gentle, caring, and very politically active soul is that he regretted that he had not become politically active sooner in his life. Yet here was a man who dedicated years to helping others. He was an orthopedic surgeon with the Indian Health Service in Gallup. He worked for the VA as chief of orthopedic surgery and afterward at UNM Hospital. Even when retired, he provided care to those in need, volunteering many hours at clinics for the underserved and homeless. 

How excited we were when he announced that he wanted to run for state representative. Even more impressive was that he won the seat in what was considered a conservative district. 

During his first legislative session, Bill was instrumental in ensuring that funding would be available to the Legislative Finance Committee so it would have the resources to hire consultants to conduct the fiscal analysis of the Health Security Act. As a state representative, he used his influence to talk to diverse groups and lobbyists, and he spoke to other legislators, no matter their politics, about the Act. 

He also wrote letters in response to articles on universal coverage, making sure that out-of-state health policy experts knew that New Mexico had a great proposal for controlling costs and ensuring comprehensive coverage. Bill was constantly evaluating where the Campaign needed to go, and he was always coming up with creative new ideas. 

Philosopher William James once wrote, "The greatest use of life is to spend it for something that will outlast it." 

All of us at the Health Security for New Mexicans Campaign are committed to making sure we build on the rich legacy Bill has given to us. What a wonderful tribute it will be when we succeed in establishing the Health Security Plan.